愛のむきだし Sion Sono, (2008)
At the Melbourne International Film Festival last year, two films by director Sion Sono
were screened, Cold Fish and Guilty of Romance unfortunately I didn’t
get to see either of them, something I now regret. Even now I still haven’t
seen them, and as far as I know only Guilty
of Romance has seen a DVD release in Australia as yet. But over Easter I
watched one of his previous works, Love
Exposure from 2008. My only experience with Sono up until then had been Suicide Club, a cult favourite from
2002. After watching the trailer for Love
Exposure I decided to give it a shot. And I am still am unsure what it was
exactly that I subjected myself to.
The film starts of simply
enough, teenager Yu grows up in a seemingly ordinary Catholic household, until
the death of his mother results in his father Tetsu’s decision to become a
priest. Over time, Tetsu urges his son to go to confession. Yu, having never
really thought of himself as a sinner, finds that his confessions of not
helping an old lady across the street or stomping on ants just aren’t good
enough for his father. So, with the best of intentions and only wanting to
please his father, Yu falls in with a band of delinquents in order to learn how
to really sin, and soon becomes a ninja-like master of upskirt photography,
pornography being the one sin no priest can excuse. If this sounds like some
kind of twisted sacrilegious attempt at comedy, I can tell you, that’s exactly what it is. Yu is trained by
an old Mr. Miyagi style character in the ways and techniques of upskirting in a
particularly hilarious training montage, with Yu cartwheeling and backflipping
through the streets, covertly stealing photos of girl’s underwear. The whole
Catholic angle is very interesting, it feels like a satirical comment on Christ
based religions in Japan,
particularly exploring the concept of sin, which plays a huge part in the film.
Catholicism isn’t the only thing critiqued though, a cult “Church Zero” is
introduced, and its members are just as crazy and even more manipulative. One
of its leaders, Aya, sets a complicated and malevolent plan in motion to
convert Yu and his family to their church, and this is where the movie starts
getting really freaky.
One by one, Sono throws
rules out the window, as what first seemed purely comedic film becomes a mind
bending psychodrama. The characters’ personalities undergo so many changes and
relationships become so complicated that it’s hard to keep track. Yu falls in
love with a girl called Yoko (a very impressive and sustained performance by
Hikari Mitsushima), who he believes to be the one he has waited so long for,
but Yoko falls in love with a woman named Sasori (yes, that Sasori!) who is
actually Yu in disguise, while the psychotic Aya continues to infiltrate their
family and turn them against Yu. Phew. Most of these particularly confusing
plot developments take place in the film’s second half.
Did I mention that this film
goes for four hours?
This film tackles so many
themes and gets into such bizarre territory that I find it quite hard to talk
about, or even form an opinion on. Religion, sin, perversion, love, sexuality,
brainwashing... The gang’s all here, and it does get exhausting. I loved the
aforementioned reference to Meiko Kaji as Sasori, and also the inclusion of
such non Japanese elements like Catholicism were very interesting to see
represented, particularly in such a critical/comedic way. The use of Ravel’s
Bolero was a cheeky addition to Yu’s upskirting escapades, his perverted
pastime becoming a beautiful ballet of sin. Moments of bloody violence and
sexuality are peppered throughout, with the characters going from one extreme
to the next in a matter of scene changes. Some of the shooting locations are so
beautiful, particularly the beach where Yu and Yoko hide from Church Zero in an
abandoned van, and inside the eerie, minimalist Church Zero building.
This film is bizarre, funny and
freaky. The four hour running time will definitely test, if not completely
repel you. It is not a film I loved as a whole, but parts of it I really
enjoyed and I couldn’t help admiring its unbridled ambition, as many film
festivals also seemed to, it received various prizes for directing and acting.
It’s a film I feel like I would be reluctant to recommend, but at the same
time, it’s the kind of film I would want people to see so it can be discussed
and unpacked. Weeks after I watched it, I’m still puzzled and intrigued by it,
but not fully understanding seems a part of its strange appeal. Sion Sono has
created an epic vision so jam-packed full of ideas that it’s ridiculous… and I
feel I shall have to give myself a long break until I tackle another of his
films.